<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 07:59:20 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Not There Yet - Episodes Tagged with “Marketing”</title>
    <link>https://www.ntyessays.com/tags/marketing</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <description>The Not There Yet podcast is a ongoing series of short essays covering a wide range of subjects from the perspective of the third decade of the 21st century. They are intended to be thought provoking, challenging, skeptical and hopefully funny once in a while. They are sometimes conventional in nature and others are a little more experimental. They cover science, history, sports, technology, philosophy or just about whatever subject comes to mind. Sometimes they look forward, other times they look back. They will not, however, take up a lot of your time and will be told in an interesting and accessible way.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>Eclectic essays podcasted from the third decade of the 21st century.</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Terence C. Gannon</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>The Not There Yet podcast is a ongoing series of short essays covering a wide range of subjects from the perspective of the third decade of the 21st century. They are intended to be thought provoking, challenging, skeptical and hopefully funny once in a while. They are sometimes conventional in nature and others are a little more experimental. They cover science, history, sports, technology, philosophy or just about whatever subject comes to mind. Sometimes they look forward, other times they look back. They will not, however, take up a lot of your time and will be told in an interesting and accessible way.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/4/4a1870b9-d046-43eb-8119-f6649b6574fa/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Terence C. Gannon</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>ntyessays@intellog.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Arts">
  <itunes:category text="Books"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>How Himalaya Should Spend the $100 Million</title>
  <link>https://www.ntyessays.com/035</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">9e323604-2a04-44a5-8281-97dd2c4a8f85</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <author>Terence C. Gannon</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/4a1870b9-d046-43eb-8119-f6649b6574fa/9e323604-2a04-44a5-8281-97dd2c4a8f85.mp3" length="27302892" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Terence C. Gannon</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>They didn't ask me but here's what I think anyway.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>18:57</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/4/4a1870b9-d046-43eb-8119-f6649b6574fa/episodes/9/9e323604-2a04-44a5-8281-97dd2c4a8f85/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;h3&gt;They didn't ask me but here's what I think anyway.&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I had to reread the headline at least a couple of times:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Podcast Platform Himalaya Raises $100 Million, Launches Apps With Tipping Function&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;$100 million? What on earth is Himalaya going to do with all that money? Besides, of course, the oddly headline-worthy 'tipping function'? Then it occurred to me: &lt;em&gt;The Oprah and LeBron Show&lt;/em&gt;. The two stars would richly deserve that money just so long as their deal includes three important words: &lt;em&gt;Only on Himalaya&lt;/em&gt;. At that point, Himalaya is only two tweets away from over 80 million high engagement Twitter impressions. And that's the whole game, of course. Content really is king. If there is any doubt about that just ask Netflix.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand if &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; that's delivered for the $100 million is exclusive distribution deals with those who need no further introduction other than their first name, that will be a crying shame indeed...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div&gt;*     *     *&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Listen to the rest by clicking the play button, above. The &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2Njh4z7" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;text version of this essay&lt;/a&gt; can be found on &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2TYAADF" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Medium&lt;/a&gt; where it was published contemporaneously. The key image for this episode is "On The Air" by Alan Levine  (Via Wikimedia under Creative Commons &lt;a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Attribution 2.0 Generic&lt;/a&gt;. Image slightly cropped to fit Fireside format.)&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Opinion, Tech, Marketing, Startup, Podcast </itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<h3 style="padding-top: 20px; padding-bottom: 20px; color: gray; font-weight: normal">They didn't ask me but here's what I think anyway.</h3>

<p>I had to reread the headline at least a couple of times:</p>

<p><em>Podcast Platform Himalaya Raises $100 Million, Launches Apps With Tipping Function</em></p>

<p>$100 million? What on earth is Himalaya going to do with all that money? Besides, of course, the oddly headline-worthy &#39;tipping function&#39;? Then it occurred to me: <em>The Oprah and LeBron Show</em>. The two stars would richly deserve that money just so long as their deal includes three important words: <em>Only on Himalaya</em>. At that point, Himalaya is only two tweets away from over 80 million high engagement Twitter impressions. And that&#39;s the whole game, of course. Content really is king. If there is any doubt about that just ask Netflix.</p>

<p>On the other hand if <em>all</em> that&#39;s delivered for the $100 million is exclusive distribution deals with those who need no further introduction other than their first name, that will be a crying shame indeed...</p>

<div style="text-align: center; margin-top:20px; margin-bottom:20px">*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*</div>

<p><em>Listen to the rest by clicking the play button, above. The <a href="http://bit.ly/2Njh4z7">text version of this essay</a> can be found on <a href="http://bit.ly/2TYAADF">Medium</a> where it was published contemporaneously. The key image for this episode is &quot;On The Air&quot; by Alan Levine  (Via Wikimedia under Creative Commons <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">Attribution 2.0 Generic</a>. Image slightly cropped to fit Fireside format.)</em></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<h3 style="padding-top: 20px; padding-bottom: 20px; color: gray; font-weight: normal">They didn't ask me but here's what I think anyway.</h3>

<p>I had to reread the headline at least a couple of times:</p>

<p><em>Podcast Platform Himalaya Raises $100 Million, Launches Apps With Tipping Function</em></p>

<p>$100 million? What on earth is Himalaya going to do with all that money? Besides, of course, the oddly headline-worthy &#39;tipping function&#39;? Then it occurred to me: <em>The Oprah and LeBron Show</em>. The two stars would richly deserve that money just so long as their deal includes three important words: <em>Only on Himalaya</em>. At that point, Himalaya is only two tweets away from over 80 million high engagement Twitter impressions. And that&#39;s the whole game, of course. Content really is king. If there is any doubt about that just ask Netflix.</p>

<p>On the other hand if <em>all</em> that&#39;s delivered for the $100 million is exclusive distribution deals with those who need no further introduction other than their first name, that will be a crying shame indeed...</p>

<div style="text-align: center; margin-top:20px; margin-bottom:20px">*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*</div>

<p><em>Listen to the rest by clicking the play button, above. The <a href="http://bit.ly/2Njh4z7">text version of this essay</a> can be found on <a href="http://bit.ly/2TYAADF">Medium</a> where it was published contemporaneously. The key image for this episode is &quot;On The Air&quot; by Alan Levine  (Via Wikimedia under Creative Commons <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">Attribution 2.0 Generic</a>. Image slightly cropped to fit Fireside format.)</em></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Story First, Everything Else Last</title>
  <link>https://www.ntyessays.com/034</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">01632b46-bdeb-4cf8-b59f-4079abdb3d60</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 19:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
  <author>Terence C. Gannon</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/4a1870b9-d046-43eb-8119-f6649b6574fa/01632b46-bdeb-4cf8-b59f-4079abdb3d60.mp3" length="29957351" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Terence C. Gannon</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>We need the willing suspension of disbelief to sell shoes?</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>20:48</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/4/4a1870b9-d046-43eb-8119-f6649b6574fa/episodes/0/01632b46-bdeb-4cf8-b59f-4079abdb3d60/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;h3&gt;We need the willing suspension of disbelief to sell shoes?&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"How is corporate storytelling different from other kinds of storytelling?"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was stumped by the question. I have to thank the interviewer who found the bullet point in my LinkedIn profile and called me out on it. I hope his audio editor eventually eliminates 90% of the pause that followed so I sound a whole lot sharper than I guess I must be. I eventually replied with the only thing which came into my head at the time:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"It isn't," I offered, with a hopefully inaudible rising inflection. As the interviewer seemed to approve of my initial answer, I began to gain confidence in it: "yes," I thought, "corporate storytelling is just like any other kind of storytelling, right?" That is, in the sense its ultimate effectiveness is related to its ability to transport us, the audience, to some other place or time - to have us willingly suspend our disbelief, as Aristotle put it. After that, anything is possible. We'll go wherever the storyteller wants us to go.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It just has to be a great story...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div&gt;*     *     *&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Listen to the rest by clicking the play button, above. The &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2SkO93O" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;text version of this essay&lt;/a&gt; can be found on &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/2DX8y5Q" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"&gt;Medium&lt;/a&gt; where it was published contemporaneously. The key image for this episode is a screen capture from the 2013 edition of the 'World of Red Bull' series of short promotional films. (credit: Red Bull)&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Marketing, Storytelling, Advertising, Filmmaking</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<h3 style="padding-top: 20px; padding-bottom: 20px; color: gray; font-weight: normal">We need the willing suspension of disbelief to sell shoes?</h3>

<p>&quot;How is corporate storytelling different from other kinds of storytelling?&quot;</p>

<p>I was stumped by the question. I have to thank the interviewer who found the bullet point in my LinkedIn profile and called me out on it. I hope his audio editor eventually eliminates 90% of the pause that followed so I sound a whole lot sharper than I guess I must be. I eventually replied with the only thing which came into my head at the time:</p>

<p>&quot;It isn&#39;t,&quot; I offered, with a hopefully inaudible rising inflection. As the interviewer seemed to approve of my initial answer, I began to gain confidence in it: &quot;yes,&quot; I thought, &quot;corporate storytelling is just like any other kind of storytelling, right?&quot; That is, in the sense its ultimate effectiveness is related to its ability to transport us, the audience, to some other place or time - to have us willingly suspend our disbelief, as Aristotle put it. After that, anything is possible. We&#39;ll go wherever the storyteller wants us to go.</p>

<p>It just has to be a great story...</p>

<div style="text-align: center; margin-top:20px; margin-bottom:20px">*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*</div>

<p><em>Listen to the rest by clicking the play button, above. The <a href="http://bit.ly/2SkO93O">text version of this essay</a> can be found on <a href="http://bit.ly/2DX8y5Q">Medium</a> where it was published contemporaneously. The key image for this episode is a screen capture from the 2013 edition of the &#39;World of Red Bull&#39; series of short promotional films. (credit: Red Bull)</em></p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<h3 style="padding-top: 20px; padding-bottom: 20px; color: gray; font-weight: normal">We need the willing suspension of disbelief to sell shoes?</h3>

<p>&quot;How is corporate storytelling different from other kinds of storytelling?&quot;</p>

<p>I was stumped by the question. I have to thank the interviewer who found the bullet point in my LinkedIn profile and called me out on it. I hope his audio editor eventually eliminates 90% of the pause that followed so I sound a whole lot sharper than I guess I must be. I eventually replied with the only thing which came into my head at the time:</p>

<p>&quot;It isn&#39;t,&quot; I offered, with a hopefully inaudible rising inflection. As the interviewer seemed to approve of my initial answer, I began to gain confidence in it: &quot;yes,&quot; I thought, &quot;corporate storytelling is just like any other kind of storytelling, right?&quot; That is, in the sense its ultimate effectiveness is related to its ability to transport us, the audience, to some other place or time - to have us willingly suspend our disbelief, as Aristotle put it. After that, anything is possible. We&#39;ll go wherever the storyteller wants us to go.</p>

<p>It just has to be a great story...</p>

<div style="text-align: center; margin-top:20px; margin-bottom:20px">*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;*</div>

<p><em>Listen to the rest by clicking the play button, above. The <a href="http://bit.ly/2SkO93O">text version of this essay</a> can be found on <a href="http://bit.ly/2DX8y5Q">Medium</a> where it was published contemporaneously. The key image for this episode is a screen capture from the 2013 edition of the &#39;World of Red Bull&#39; series of short promotional films. (credit: Red Bull)</em></p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
